Reasearch Awards nomination

Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Random unstimulated pediatric luteinizing hormone levels are not reliable in the assessment of pubertal suppression during histrelin implant therapy

E Kirk Neely1*, Lawrence A Silverman2, Mitchell E Geffner3, Theodore M Danoff4, Errol Gould4 and Paul S Thornton5

Author Affiliations

1 Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

2 Pediatric Endocrinology, Goryeb Children’s Hospital, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, New Jersey, USA

3 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, and The Saban Research Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

4 Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA

5 Department of Endocrinology, Cook Children’s Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology 2013, 2013:20  doi:10.1186/1687-9856-2013-20

Published: 2 December 2013

Abstract

Background

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) is the standard hormonal assessment for both diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of children with central precocious puberty (CPP). Use of unstimulated (random) LH levels may be helpful in diagnosis and has gained popularity in monitoring GnRHa therapy despite lack of validation against stimulated values. The objective of this investigation was to assess the suitability of random LH for monitoring pubertal suppression during GnRHa treatment.

Methods

Data from a multi-year, multicenter, open-label trial of annual histrelin implants for CPP was used for our analysis. Children meeting clinical and hormonal criteria for CPP, either naïve to GnRHa therapy or previously treated with another GnRHa for at least 6 months who were being treated at academic pediatric centers were included in the study. Subjects received a single 50-mg subcutaneous histrelin implant annually until final explant at an age determined at the discretion of each investigator. Monitoring visits for physical examination and GnRHa-stimulation testing were performed at regular intervals. The main outcome measure was pubertal suppression during treatment defined by peak LH < 4 mIU/mL after GnRHa stimulation.

Results

During histrelin treatment, 36 children underwent a total of 308 monitoring GnRHa stimulation tests. Unstimulated and peak LH levels were positively correlated (r = 0.798), and both declined from the first to second year of treatment. Mean ± SD peak LH level during therapy was 0.62 ± 0.43 mIU/mL (range, 0.06–2.3), well below the normal prepubertal mean. Mean random LH was 0.35 ± 0.25 mIU/mL (range, 0.04–1.5), 10-fold higher than the normal prepubertal mean. The random LH levels were above the prepubertal upper threshold (<0.3 mIU/mL) in 48.4% of all tests and in 88.9% of subjects at some point during therapy.

Conclusions

In contrast with GnRHa-stimulated LH, unstimulated LH values frequently fail to demonstrate suppression to prepubertal values during GnRHa therapy for CPP, despite otherwise apparent pubertal suppression, and are thus unsuitable for therapeutic monitoring.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00779103.

Keywords:
Central precocious puberty; Estradiol; GnRHa; Histrelin; Luteinizing hormone